Ghanaian Nationals Indicted in $100M Cybercrime Syndicate

Ghanaian Nationals Indicted in $100M Cybercrime Syndicate

In a case that has shocked both Ghana and the international community, four Ghanaian nationals—Isaac Kofi Oduro Boateng (alias “Kofi Boat”), Inusah Ahmed (“Pascal”), Derrick Van Yeboah (“Van”), and Patrick Kwame Asare (“Borgar”)—have been indicted by U.S. authorities for orchestrating an elaborate criminal network responsible for defrauding vulnerable victims and businesses of more than $100 million through romance scams and business email compromise (BEC) schemes.

1. The Alleged Scheme and Indictment

According to a May 2023 indictment issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the quartet allegedly orchestrated a sophisticated criminal enterprise operating from Ghana from 2016 to 2023. They purportedly targeted both individuals—especially elderly Americans—in romance scams, as well as U.S. businesses via BEC tactics, impersonating executives to redirect large sums of money. U.S. prosecutors have traced these illicit transfers to total in excess of $100 million, with at least one business and eight individuals named as direct victims. 

2. International Cooperation and Arrests

The arrests were the result of a coordinated operation between the FBI, Interpol, and Ghanaian law enforcement. In June 2025, on the strength of the U.S. extradition request and a warrant signed by Ghana’s Interior Minister, Hon. Muntaka Mohammed-Mubarak, Isaac Boateng, Inusah Ahmed, and Derrick Van Yeboah were apprehended in Accra and remanded by a magistrate’s court. The fourth suspect, Patrick Kwame Asare, remains at large. 

3. Extradition Dynamics and Legal Pushback

The U.S. has formally requested extradition of the detained trio to face charges in the U.S.  . However, Isaac “Kofi Boat” Oduro Boateng is vigorously challenging the extradition. During appearances at the Gbese District Court—most notably on 20 June 2025—his defence contended that the U.S. arrest warrant is procedurally flawed, arguing it was not authenticated by Ghana’s diplomatic mission in the U.S., a legal requirement under Ghanaian law. The court has adjourned the matter to 1 July 2025 for a ruling on these procedural objections. 

4. Key Courtroom Revelations from the Defence

As the case unfolds, several critical claims from Boateng’s legal team have emerged:

• The scale of the alleged fraud is misstated: Booth’s attorneys argued that the widely reported $100 million figure is misleading. According to FBI evidence, the actual amount connected to Boateng—through his associate Frederick Asante—is less than $300,000, far lower than headlines suggested. 

• Commercial—not criminal—nature of transactions: The defence maintains that the transfers were legitimate payments for business supplies, not fraud. Asante allegedly made payments on Boateng’s behalf, which were later reimbursed in Ghana cedis at agreed exchange rates—implying normal commercial activity. 

• Terminology misinterpreted by investigators: The FBI reportedly misread the term “rate” in chat logs, interpreting it as referring to kickback percentages. Boateng’s defence insists it referred instead to currency exchange rates, shifting critical meaning. 

• Denial of criminal involvement and inflated claims: Boateng has denied any involvement in massive cyberfraud and has publicly disputed the $100 million allegation, branding it false. 

• Willingness to cooperate and surrender: In a surprising twist, Boateng declared his willingness to voluntarily appear before U.S. authorities to clear his name. Additionally, he distanced himself from the other accused, contending his only connection was an isolated business transaction with a convicted associate. 

5. Broader Implications for Ghana

This case extends beyond individual defendants, coming amid growing concern over Ghana’s reputation in light of several cyberfraud cases involving nationals. Other Ghanaians, including Joseph Badu Boateng (Dada Joe Remix), convicted for romance and inheritance scams, Mona Faiz Montrage (Hajia 4Reall), sentenced for romance-related fraud, and Emmanuel Quamey, imprisoned for laundering over $3.3 million, have contributed to a narrative casting Ghana as a hub for online fraud activity—a perception troubling to authorities and residents alike. 

While Ghana is still widely respected for its stability and economic potential, these high-profile cases are eroding investor confidence and potentially unfairly affecting ordinary citizens.

6. What Lies Ahead

The July 1st hearing will be pivotal—if the court rules the extradition request or warrant inadmissible, it could delay or even derail proceedings. Conversely, if the court validates the U.S. submission, Boateng and his co-accused may be extradited and face serious federal charges.

In the U.S., indictments under the wire fraud and money laundering statutes carry severe penalties: wire fraud alone can result in up to 20–30 years per count, especially when elderly victims are targeted; money laundering adds up to 10 years per count—consequences that could cumulatively result in decades behind bars. 

The Bottom Line

This case epitomizes the complexities of 21st-century crime, where financial fraud transcends borders, leveraging digital communication and emotional manipulation. It raises urgent questions:

• Has Ghana’s legal system been fully respected in the U.S. extradition request?

• Was the alleged fraud truly to the tune of $100 million, or is that a sensational exaggeration?

• Are the accused guilty, or is their defence plausible?

• And how will Ghana navigate emerging reputational risks without violating due process?

As the story continues to unfold—both in Ghana’s courts and potentially in the U.S.—it serves as a sobering reminder of the global risks posed by cyber-enabled financial crimes, and the essential need for vigilance, legality, and critical media scrutiny.

Let me know if you’d like a shorter summary, infographic-style breakdown, or a social-media-friendly snippet for wider circulation.